Chongyu Zhu Claudia Pellegrino Eric Knibbe Gautham Goli Igor Kapkov Izaak “Zaak” Beekman Jan Viljanen Jason Tedor Sean Molenaar Steven Peters Thierry Moisan Tom Schoonjans Viktor Szakats Vítor Galvão William Woodruff other maintainers reviewed this application and have expressed their support.Markus Reiter Project Leadership, Technical Steering).Misty De Meo Project Leadership, Technical Steering).Homebrew has 22 maintainers their GitHub handle is listed below as well as other specific administrative roles they might have: Homebrew is actively maintained, and its last release was v2.1.0 on April 5, 2019. Is the project actively maintained? If so, please give contact details of the maintainers and indicate whether they are aware of and/or supportive of this application. What is the maintenance status of the project? Homebrew also relies on Microsoft’s Azure Pipelines continuous integration service to run our test suite on macOS and Linux. Homebrew interacts with the Bintray API to upload and host our binary packages. Homebrew’s source code is hosted on GitHub. Does the project contain any proprietary code, or depend on or use a proprietary web service? If so, please give details Homebrew also vendors three dependencies, which are all MIT licensed ( ). Homebrew’s code is licensed under a BSD 2-clause license. What copyright license or licenses cover the project’s source code? On Linux and Windows, it should seek to be as self-contained as possible. Where possible and sensible, it should seek to use features of macOS to blend in with the macOS and Apple ecosystems. Its primary goal is to be useful to as many people as possible, while remaining maintainable to a professional, high standard by a small group of volunteers. Homebrew aims to be the missing package manager for macOS (and Linux). Maintainer Project website (This needs to be somewhere we can obtain the source code.) Jonathan Chang Your relationship to the project The answers to such questions are often not “yes” or “no”, but matters of degree, and so Mozilla will take the entire picture into account when assessing projects. Does the software have existing corporate backing or involvement?.Has the software been audited before? If so, when and how extensively? Was the audit made public? If so, where?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |